Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

impl Traits can be used as function arguments. Are there differences between this and a generic function with a trait constraint?

trait Foo {}

fn func1(_: impl Foo) {}

fn func2<T: Foo>(_: T) {}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
687 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

impl Traits as function arguments are desugared to an anonymous generic parameter. See the RFC, which says:

Expand impl Trait to allow use in arguments, where it behaves like an anonymous generic parameter.

There's also an example in the RFC:

// These two are equivalent
fn map<U>(self, f: impl FnOnce(T) -> U) -> Option<U>
fn map<U, F>(self, f: F) -> Option<U> where F: FnOnce(T) -> U

However, one difference is that impl Trait arguments cannot have their types explicitly specified:

fn foo<T: Trait>(t: T)
fn bar(t: impl Trait)

foo::<u32>(0) // this is allowed
bar::<u32>(0) // this is not

The Motivation for expanding to argument position section explains why additional syntax was added for an existing feature. In short, it's for having similar syntax as impl traits in function return position, which improves learnability, and to improve ergonomics.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share

548k questions

547k answers

4 comments

86.3k users

...