Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I understand how both __init__ and __new__ work. I'm wondering if there is anything __init__ can do that __new__ cannot?

i.e. can use of __init__ be replaced by the following pattern:

class MySubclass(object):
    def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
        self = super(MySubclass, cls).__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
        // Do __init__ stuff here
        return self

I'm asking as I'd like to make this aspect of Python OO fit better in my head.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
995 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

So, the class of a class is typically type, and when you call Class() the __call__() method on Class's class handles that. I believe type.__call__() is implemented more or less like this:

def __call__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
    # should do the same thing as type.__call__
    obj = cls.__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
    if isinstance(obj, cls):
        obj.__init__(*args, **kwargs)
    return obj

The direct answer to your question is no, the things that __init__() can do (change / "initialize" a specified instance) is a subset of the things that __new__() can do (create or otherwise select whatever object it wants, do anything to that object it wants before the object is returned).

It's convenient to have both methods to use, however. The use of __init__() is simpler (it doesn't have to create anything, it doesn't have to return anything), and I believe it is best practice to always use __init__() unless you have a specific reason to use __new__().


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...